Andy Daniels

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 121 through 126 (of 126 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2013 AX7 Final results #2370
    Andy Daniels
    Participant

    [quote=”werdb” post=2038]On a side note, not sure if anyone else with a BMW Apps equipped car used the new M LapTimer that BMW just put out.
    It’s fairly awesome, uses the cars GPS and sensors to build a nifty little data acquisition map.
    Tracks, speed, steering, throttle %, brakes (as g-force deceleration), RPM, g-force, & MPG
    It did a fairly decent job of mapping the track layout as well using the car’s GPS.[/quote]
    I was wondering if anyone had tried that yet. The apps I’ve seen so far seem to work better for track loops than for AX.

    in reply to: 2013 AX6 – Final Results #2325
    Andy Daniels
    Participant

    [quote=”m3gogo” post=1996]And who would that be? Sorry, don’t have everyone’s avatar memorized here.[/quote]
    Sorry, thought I’d already set up my forum sig.

    Andy Daniels, #793. My time slip for run 5 says +3, and in the video I’ve clearly taken out at least two cones during my spin after the finish line. Doesn’t change any standings or my best time, though, so not that big a deal.

    in reply to: 2013 AX6 – Final Results #2323
    Andy Daniels
    Participant

    Not that it really makes any substantial difference, but I’m pretty sure that my +1 was actually a +3.

    in reply to: September 14, 2013 – AX #6 Course Design #2293
    Andy Daniels
    Participant

    [quote=”LivesNearCostco” post=1954]Since the course is different every time, the standard of comparison has to be how many seconds slower I am compared to the better drivers.[/quote]
    Since each course [i]is[/i] different, I suggest looking at the [i]ratios[/i] of your times to those of the better drivers (or, equivalently, the difference of their logarithms) instead of raw time differences. That will better account for the differences in overall length and difficulty of the courses.

    [quote]Or maybe how consistent or inconsistent my runs are.[/quote]
    Also good. At my level of experience, I’m happy if I see a consistent improvement in times throughout the day and look for consistency of line in the videos afterwards. Then, I look at my overall standing for the day and get depressed. 🙁

    in reply to: September 14, 2013 – AX #6 Course Design #2273
    Andy Daniels
    Participant

    [quote=”JeffC” post=1926]I was definitely struggling around this course. I called it my nemesis.[/quote]

    This novice was encouraged when I discovered that the old hands were also having trouble figuring out the course. It was deceptively straightforward-looking on paper.

    in reply to: July 13th, 2013 – AX #4 Course Design #2105
    Andy Daniels
    Participant

    I enjoyed both this month’s and last month’s courses. Very different problems to solve in the two of them, of course. Don’t know what this might say about the two designs, but I did notice that I wasn’t nearly as tired afterwards as I was the month before. :shrug:

Viewing 6 posts - 121 through 126 (of 126 total)